Our State
By
Wale Adebanwi
In this season in which
multiple monologues are masquerading as dialogues regarding how
to reconstitute and perhaps rehabilitate the Nigerian State, it
is meet that we encourage dialogue on that state, the state (I
mean, condition) of the state, and the state (stage and
dynamics) of the ‘dialogue’. The Shakespearean play,
Hamlet, already points us in the direction of the sad
commentary. We can twist what the officer of the palace guard,
Marcellus,
says in the play after the ghost of the dead king appears,
walking over the palace walls: Something is rotten in the
State of Nigeria! Whether that ‘something’ is wrong on
the surface, or wrong fundamentally - in a way that is integral
to the very idea of Nigeria and the way the country was
constituted - is another debate.
The present holders of power
would want us to believe that this is a surface-level problem
which can be solved by “good governance”, “transparency”,
“purposeful leadership”, and maybe “total loyalty”. So,
they think if they can continue in this state for a few more
years, all will be well. They are, of course, deeply embedded in
a limited vision of Nigeria as a towering, but lame, country,
that functions well enough for their crippling passions to hold
sway. But, in many ways, they are helped and sustained by the
Brettonwoodian-economistic lexicon of “good governance” that
ignores salient political basis for such governance and glosses
over the contextual dynamics of economic, political and social
retardation. It is against this backdrop that we are told by the
present occupiers of the Villa that they are the
sovereign; in addition, they remind us constantly that
Nigeria is a finished project, sacred and inviolable, and that
no one should raise any question on whether the country should
and would continue as a single country. This, no doubt, explains
their opposition to a national talk-shop with the prefix, “sovereign”.
From General Sani Abacha to General Olusegun Obasanjo, the
campaign for such a national deliberation was trivialized, if
not violated, by the convocation of laughable versions of this
much-needed confab. But, as Engels argued long ago, it is when
the state becomes alien and distant from the people that it is
constituted to embody and represent that it begins to rely more
and more desperately on the its sacredness and inviolability.
Need we repeat: There is nothing inviolable about Nigeria ab
initio, unless the people agree to it.
There is no doubt that
Nigeria, as a State, is in a bad state – in bad shape. Is this
because she is herself a bad State, a bastard algebra composed
by the pathetic colonialist, Fredrick Lugard?
But, let us for a moment
consider the word “state” in its many and different
meanings. As the lexicographers teach us, a state can mean: “a
condition or mode of being, as with regard to
circumstances” for example, “a state of confusion”; “a
condition of being in a stage or form, as of structure, growth,
or development”, for example “the fetal state”;
“a mental or emotional condition”, for example “in a manic
state” (or, to draw a local example, you can say,
“Nigeria is in a rotten state”). Informally, one can also
speak of “state” as “a condition of excitement or
distress”; while in physics, “state” can mean “the
condition of a physical system with regard to phase, form,
composition, or structure”, for example, you can say “ice is
the solid state of water” (or, to draw on non-physical
example, “rottenness is the normal state of Nigeria”).
“State” can denote a “social position or rank”; it can
also mean ceremony and pomp, like in “foreign leaders dining
in state at the Aso Rock Villa”.
Yet, this same word can mean
“the supreme public power within a sovereign political
entity”, or “the sphere of supreme civil power within a
given polity”, for example “matters of state”.
Furthermore, the word can denote “a specific mode of
government”, like a socialist state; “a body politic,
especially one constituting a nation”, like the African
states; or “one of the more or less internally autonomous
territorial and political units composing a federation under a
sovereign government”, like Ogun State. As a transitive verb,
to “state” could mean “to set forth in words; to
declare”. The synonyms of “state” includes condition,
situation and status. Perhaps, the first synonym explains a lot,
as Fela teaches in his timeless song, “Army Arrangement”,
where he croons that, “suffer dey Africa paparapa,
condition dey paparapa….” Fela’s “condition”
captures the state of affairs in Africa in which “rich man
dey mess (while) poor man dey suffer”. It is precisely the
task of reversing the state of the Nigerian State that patriotic
voices have been calling for a national deliberation on the
state of our state so that it does not end with the country
having to lie-in-state.
Basically, what those calling
for a national talk-shop are advocating for is the fundamental
need for Nigerians in their different modes - religious, ethnic,
regional, etc. – to state their case to the state which has
hurt and is hurting most of them deeply. It is the irreducible
minimum that can guarantee the continued existence of the state;
the true expression of the sovereignty of that state, which
exists only in the people as a collective. If the people cannot
state their case to the state, then it is a bad state.
But those opposed to a
national talk-shop are stating, vicariously, that Nigeria is in
such a bad state that allowing people to state their cases would
lead to the state (Nigeria) lying-in-state. They add that
allowing such a talk shop will make it possible for
“separatists” to realize what remains presently “States of
imagination”, including such as “Biafra”, “Oodua
Republic”, “Republic of Niger Delta” - and perhaps
“Arewa Republic”. In the context of all these battles, all
sorts of ancillary issues have also polarized the State. Take
“resource control”, which is one of the issues slated for
debate at the national talk-shop. Elements opposed to the
reconstitution of Nigeria have even revised the state of affairs
in the Niger Delta. For example, Dr. Bala Usman, the recently
departed historian, who possessed an almost unequalled ability
to trivialize and argument while attempting to deepen it, wrote
that the debris that washed down from the north decomposed and
formed the fossils that became crude oil in the Niger Delta!
This kind of thinking is the product of the state of hysteria in
the north, over the “loss of power”, which the semi-literate
governor of Sokoto State, Alhaji
Attahiru Dalhatu Bafarawa – whose similarly limited
biographer described as a “political
colossal (sic)” -
captured well when he said, “we want our
power back”!
The first group –
supporters of national talk-shop - insists that the position
that a national talk-shop will lead to the disintegration of
Nigeria is a lie; that it is precisely such lying about
Nigeria that has conditioned the country to remain in a fetal
state, too stunted in her growth for her to meet her manifest
destiny as an African power state. Some even go to the extreme
to ask what is wrong with dismembering what Joe Klein of TIME
magazine would call, a “prohibitively raucous canine nation”
that is Nigeria.
Despite the evidence that stares everyone in the face that
without such a reconsideration of the state of our State, the
state itself, which is already in-state (pregnant), may deliver
a monster for all. The present leadership, almost in a
manic state, is enjoying the pomp and ceremony of office while
the State burns. The leadership seems to be blind to the
reality; high officials of the State are staring into a blinding
light. Without doubt, this will lead to a state of darkness.
The condition we are in now is such that the sinister
power bastion might end up sucking the State in.
In reality that
power bastion, if we lift the veil, is a politically exhausted,
even if also exhaustive, cabal, but one that is - being in its
last breath of life - in a manic state. In such a state, even
the State can go down the hill for all they care. Which also
explains, in part, the new sundering of Nigeria along regional
lines. The Southern front that was recently fabricated has been
dismissed by some as part of a more elaborate attempt to keep
Nigeria in the mire, the state in which she has been for the
most part. Or, indeed, some have argued that if this north-south
divide is pushed further as we march towards 2007, then the
condition of Nigeria might even worsen. But, events and actions
of the present power holders have already indicated that the
feared state of affairs is upon them - and our State.
As Hamlet says in the (modern
text of the) play, Hamlet, “It’s
my fate calling me. Every nerve in my body is now as tough as
steel. The ghost is still waving me over. Let me go,
gentlemen.” Voices of reason might eventually hold back when
confronted with the threat of Hamlet: “I swear, if anyone
holds me back. I’ll make a ghost of him”. Horatio ponders
that it is Hamlet’s imagination that is making him crazy, even
while asking: “But what does it all mean, where will it all
end?” It was at this point that Marcellus makes his remarkable
statement: “It means that something is rotten in the state of
Denmark”. Horatio more or less gives up when confronted with
that deep reflection. “If that’s true, we should let God
take care of it”, says Horatio. “Lif’am for God”, as it
is written on the east-bound coach, is a perpetual consolation
for Nigerians – whenever they are in a terrible state…
To
all those who have lost – and may lose – loved ones in this
rotten state, to this rotten system, and the coming rottenness,
our condolences….