|
Share this Article!
Related Links of Interest
UN-Africa
www.alexblackhistory.org
www.Allafrica.com
www.NABJ.com
www.Dawodu.com
www.newsdayng.com
www.nigerianmuse.com
www.nigeriavillagesquare.com
www.Nigeriaworld.com
www.Gamji.com
www.whitehouse.gov
www.state.gov
www.theblacktelevision.com
www.nabj.org
www.naaj.org
www.ire.org
www.poynter.org
www.spj.org
www.truththeory.com
Reach African Pros
www.anpa.org
www.nigerianlwayers.org
Newspaper Sites
Daily Trust
Daily Times
Daily Champion
Daily Independent
www.ghanaweb.com
Hotline
Mathaba.net
New Nigerian
Newswatch
Punch
www.sabcnews.com
SPLMToday
www.sudantribune.com
ReddingNewsReview.com
The Comet
The
Guardian
The Triumph
Thisday
Tribune
Vanguard
Weekly Trust
Westafricannews.net
IRIN
BBC
CNN
Yahoo
Al-Mizan
[Hausa]
VOA
[Hausa]
Weather for Africa
| |
Africa needs people power
By former President Jerry Rawlings
Before I comment on the G8 summit, first I must condemn the terrorist attack on
London and express my deep sympathy for the bereaved families, the wounded and
the British people. The atrocity inevitably diverted the attention of
participants and public, and it is impossible to know what the G8 would have
produced had the shocking events of July 7 not occurred.
We in Africa have been calling for debt cancellation for two decades.
Responsible African governments have endeavoured to keep up their debt
obligations and have at times been paying out a lot more than they receive.
Therefore even selective debt cancellation is welcome. The debt-relief debate
has, however, engendered the false impression - dangerous for Africa's
development prospects - that the G8 concession means access to more foreign, and
free, funds for national development.
The reality is that no funds are coming from external sources. Debt cancellation
means the removal of the obligation to transfer financial resources to the
creditor. This belief might lead to an unfortunate situation in which
governments abdicate responsibility for sustainable economic development,
assuming that debt cancellation is a panacea for their country's problems.
As one of the few African leaders to resuscitate a collapsed economy, I would
have preferred unconditional debt cancellation for all sub-Saharan Africa, with
a monitoring system to ensure that the released funds go into basic
infrastructure, health, education and provision of good drinking water - and are
not deposited in banks in donor countries. Why should some of the most deprived
people continue to suffer just because they have governments that do not
qualify for selection? Perhaps these people, if they had the basic needs of
life, would have the strength to gain justice from their governments.
Indeed, it might even be the case that a few of those beneficiary governments
would welcome debt relief as a way to replenish funds and entrench their power,
violating their citizens' human rights and corrupting the moral fibre of
society. Paradoxically, debt relief based on perceived good governance could
inflict worse governance practices. In Ghana the economy collapsed due to
mismanagement and tyrannical rule. This led in effect to the revolt of 1979,
enabling the nation to exorcise some of its anger. But you can't get the best
out of people who feel enslaved and exploited; and fortunately, with hardwork,
we managed to channel the energy of anger into productivity.
Out of that revolt emerged a government under my leadership that was accountable
and transparent, and maintained a high level of integrity. We did not empower
ourselves at the expense of the people. On the contrary we empowered the people,
through political and economic decentralisation.
Working with the World Bank and the IMF, my government halted Ghana's decline;
we inherited a near collapsed state and built a five per cent growth rate before
handing over to the present government. This would not have been possible
if I had presided over a corrupt, dictatorial and exploitative government. In
other words, true democracy works - you can't go wrong when the people become
part of the decision-making process and take equal responsibility for successes
and failures.
At the G8 I would also have preferred to see some discussions on fair trade,
rather than aid, to create sustainable development. On subsidies the outcome was
weak - comforting words, but little real agreement or commitment to substantial
action. Meanwhile, in Ghana, for example, textile factories are closing down,
the poultry industry is in crisis, and our farmers cannot compete with cheap
imports. Thousands are losing productive jobs.
I may appear to have a rather jaundiced view of Gleneagles, but there is cause
for hope. Africa's battle to overcome poverty is due to the pressure from
African nations and the wave of international support, especially from
personalities such as Bob Geldof. These forces have sent a clear signal to the
G8 leaders that their own electorate expect them to address global poverty.
At the same time, we in those 24 African countries that will benefit from debt
cancellation have a responsibility to ensure that our governments put every
single dollar that would otherwise have been consumed by debt repayment to work
in the interests of the poorest of the poor: not through selective handouts, but
by empowerment, education, and the provision of power and clean water - enabling
our people to work and to live in conditions of human dignity and
hope.
[Flight Lieutenant Rawlings, a former president of Ghana wrote this
piece for The Guardian of London, on July 14.]
|
